.NET Compiled in Debug? How do you know?

Recently I had a need to find out if the build was in Debug mode. Our build process produced debug code in production, causing all kinds of issues so I went out into the web to find a way of determining if an assembly (or executable) was created in debug.  It was much harder than I initially thought to get this information.

The article posted at The Black Box of .NET had the answer I was looking for.

.NET 4 – Tuple instead of out parameters

.NET 4 introduced a tuple class which can be very useful.

Wikipedia defines a Tuple as “… a tuple is an ordered list of elements.”

MSDN defines a Tuple as “A tuple is a data structure that has a specific number and sequence of elements.”

You may be asking right now, “What am I supposed to do with that?”  I hope to give you a good idea by the time you are done reading this post.  I will provide a few examples of why, when and how to use them.  Let’s get to it.

One of my pet peeves is output parameters also known as ByRef in VB.  I know there many reasons to use them but the default seems to be where you need to return more than one value from a function.  Consider the following:

string outParameter1, outParameter2;
var v = OutParameterFunction("Test", out outParameter1, out outParameter2);
Console.WriteLine("return value: {0} :: out parameters: {1}, {2}", v, outParameter1, outParameter2);

public static int OutParameterFunction(string inParameter, out string outParameter1, out string outParameter2)
     var retValue = 0;
     outParameter1 = null;

     if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(inParameter))
         outParameter1 = inParameter;
         outParameter2 = "Kewl";
         retValue = 1;
     else outParameter2 = "NOT Kewl";

     return retValue;

Simply put there are two values being returned with one of them being the integer value and the other being the output string parameter.

It would be easy to circumvent issue by creating a class to hold the multiple values and return the class.  What happens when you have a bunch of permutations of data, you could end up having dozens of container classes therefore increasing the cost of maintenance.

Another option would be to use an array of object.  Although it can be done, it has a huge performance impact and

The tuple option can be like this:

var t = TupleFunction("Test");
Console.WriteLine("return value: {0} :: {1}", t.Item1, t.Item2, t.Item3);

public static Tuple<int, string, string> TupleFunction(string inParameter)
var retInt = 0;
var retString1 = string.Empty;
string retString2;

     if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(inParameter))
retString1 = inParameter;
retString2 = "Kewl";
retInt = 1;
else retString2 = "NOT Kewl";

     return Tuple.Create(retInt, retString1, retString2);

The code performs the same overall function but does not rely on output parameters.  You may look at the source as the same length and seems to hide the vales inside of a strange object.  The caller of the Tuple function does not have to create a container variable except for the return value.  Consider the situation where the call needs to be extended to return a third value, or a forth?  The tuple can be extended with more values and the caller can deal with the longer return set or not as the caller’s choice (if you like var) because the actual call is not determined at run time but at compile time.

There are some drawbacks to tuples:

  1. You can’t change the values once placed into a tuple.
  2. Unlike list types, you can’t iterate through the values.

I hope this helps.

Windows: Wired vs Wireless

This morning I started up my work laptop after placing gently yet firmly into the docking station and saw my connection to the network was with the wireless network.  Something inside of me thought, “The docking station has a wired connection, why not use it versus a wireless connection?”.  Now that I have considered it for more than a few minutes, I am a little upset about the wireless preference when a perfectly good wired connection exists.

Armed with a sense of righteous empowerment and a little noodle power, I think I have come up with a sure fire way for WIndows to chose the right connection given a set of scenarios.  Here goes:

  1. Speed advantage– If one is faster than another then go with the fastest
    • Pros – the fastest will result in the best experience for the user.
    • Cons – How often does the measurement need to take place?  Do we warn the user when switching in case they are streaming or connected via VPN or any form of connection where the adapter and the data flow matters?
    • Net – I don’t see this as a viable option when it comes to configuration because the cons are too many and too hard to interpret.
  2. All network connections– Have no preference and use them all at once
    • Pros – Amazing throughput for applications that can use more than one connection at a time.
    • Cons – Incredibly complex implementation.  If wired and wireless are pointing to the same network there would be no advantage to the multiple connection points.  Possible application issues for apps that require a specific MAC or IP.
    • Net – Too many potential issues but if it could be done, the result could be amazing.
  3. Use wired as primary then wireless as a secondary or allow the user to select a preference
    • Pros – Simple and predictable; wired is usually better for speed and throughput; user preferential order for overrides; the functionality for wireless already exists
    • Cons – The user needs to know which is faster; the user may get confused if too many networks are available
    • Net – Easiest for Windows to support because half of the functionality exists

I don’t think making the third option work would be too hard and third parties may be able to get the other options working.  This request will be made to the Microsoft support network but I am interested in getting your feedback.

The PowerShell Journey: Part 1

As a developer I try to use the latest and greatest and when something good comes about I try to pick up as much of it as I can.  The use of command or batch files has been a part of my world for a long as I have used computers.  Back in the day, there were batch menus for DOS computers so people with little or no computer experience could get the their applications (Lotus 123, Wordstar, etc.)  The days of doing DOS menus has past but the power of the command shell remains.

The New Command Shell for Windows

I know I am late to the party when it comes to PowerShell but when it comes to shells I am skeptical at first, excited or dismayed second.  Recently there seems to be more and more need to run a shell with more power than VBScript could hope to provide, I was skeptical but I now see the fruit of such a pursuit.  When PowerShell hit the street I hardly noticed because I was very happy with my shell and I could do anything with a cscript command that could not be done with old DOS commands.   Thanks, but no thanks.

Then something changed, I needed to run a script to start & stop an IIS application pool on another server.  I looked and found this http://blog.developers.ie/cgreen/archive/2006/10/20/2341.aspx which clearly uses .NET to control a remote IIS web application pool.  I was about to translate this to VBScript when I thought about what PowerShell is supposed to be able to do out of the box.  I pursued it and came up with the following script:

# Action : Start, Stop, Recycle
param([string]$server, [string]$AppPool, [string]$Action)
$sPath = "IIS://" + $server + "/W3SVC/AppPools/" + $AppPool
$de = New-Object System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry($sPath)

I know it isn’t sexy but it performs the task I needed. This is just the beginning, I’m sure there will be more scripts with more meat in them. Stay tuned, I am starting a series: The PowerShell Journey.

Backup and Archive

I have been using USB connected drives to backup the computer for a while now.  I can’t remember when I started but it was around the time when my daughter was born (Jan 2006).   Before the USB drive backup system, I was using DVD disks, several of them and waiting a long time for the backup to complete.   These backups were with an application that would attempt to compress the data and write out in their proprietary format to the disks.  One day I had a hard drive crash and found the disks but I had not backed-up the application.  I found the program later but the whole restore process was not pleasant.  In came USB drives and I could backup the files intact without using a backup program and the world was well again.

Four years later, I am backing up to an online web storage solution called BackBlaze and I love it for the most part.  The service took a very long time to do the initial backup but I have slept well at night since then knowing I have a copy of all of my files safe and sound.  The service does not save a history of the files backed up though, nor does it contain a list of old files I do not have on my primary or connected hard drive.

I still save an archive of old files and such to two USB drives.  The first is a 320GB drive used for the photos and videos we have taken over the years and the second is a 1.5TB drive for everything else.

Everyone needs a backup solution make sure you find one that works for you.

Code Simplification: String Maximum Length

I was looking at some old code and ran across something that struck a chord of wrong with me.

string temp; 
temp = "There can only be one!";
if (temp.length > 15) temp = temp.substring(0, 15);

Then I thought we could use a little math to handle the problem:

string temp; 
temp = "There can only be one!";
temp = temp.substring(0, Math.Min(15, temp.Length));

I think Microsoft should have included this kind of method to the String class. Hope this helps.

AMD: Remember you are a technology company!

AMD seems to have lost itself somewhere along the way.  I have owned several AMD-based systems over the years starting with a 386 clone to an Athlon several years ago.   Having a deep love for all things hardware and software, I like to know what the technical specifications of just about anything I read about.  The type of hardware doesn’t matter, be it a hard drive, case, power supply or processor; it’s all good to me.  That is why I need to convey my deep disappointment about AMD.

I saw a new laptop on Newegg‘s web site and was intrigued to see a processor I have never seen before.  The processor is a mobile Phenom II quad-core and the machine looks like a upper-middle end machine except I know nothing about the processor.  I assumed that going to the AMD web site would yield all kinds of information about the processor.  I was utterly flabbergasted to see it not on the list of mobile processors from the home page.  I then searched the web site for the phrase “mobile Phenom” with odd results, the first two links had the processor named but no link to any technical documentation just all kinds of marketing.  The third link took me to a page listing all the classifications for the processors with “AMD Notebook Platform for Home” and “AMD Notebook Platform for Work” listed but when I clicked on those I get more of what I found in the initial search, marketing material.  Then I saw on the far right, a link to “Compare Processors” with notebook processors listed and there is a compare page.  I select the first “AMD Phenom™ II Quad-Core Mobile Processors” option and there are two processors I clicked on the P620 and no luck.  Just the basic technical facts about the design and manufacturing of the processor.  Don’t they think we want to know about the power management features, the memory controller, the memory type is uses, etc?  Twenty minutes and nothing to show for it.

I gave up at this point and looked for more detail outside of the AMD site and was disappointed again.  Another five minutes lead me to all kinds of speculation on performance because AMD has no material to say how the processor performs relative to the old line of mobile processors or even compared to the desktop version.

How can I buy a machine when I know virtually nothing about the processor?

AMD, I know I am just one guy but here are your action items:

  • Make the specifications of your processors easier to find and available to search engines.  I hate to point out that your direct competitor makes 90% of the specifications very easy to find.  Do the same.
  • Make a detailed specifications page with all of the details including architecture, bus configuration and any other real selling points for a technology geek.  If your marketing department is feeling a little left out, then include links to the marketing materials for the pseudo-techs or non-techs.
  • If it makes sense, have a technology oriented version of your site where people like me can find the dirty details like relative performance and technology factors to make educated decisions on the validity of the processor as the platform for a tech-geek.

You may just sell more of your product if more information is available.